Receive SIWI’s latest news, events, reports and jobs directly in your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

The project engaged a broad set of stakeholders in applying the source-to-sea approach to addressing prioritized local challenges in two locations, Lake Hawassa Sub-Basin in Ethiopia and Vu Gia-Thu Bon River Basin in Vietnam. During the project, local stakeholders have not only acquired a better understanding of the challenges they face in addressing sediment and pollution issues across the source-to-sea (or lake) continuum, but also the benefits of source-to-sea management as a method to address them.
By developing a shared knowledge base, the project has set the foundations for more informed decisions to be made in the management of sediment and plastic pollution flows in the pilot regions. Stakeholders have also learned of the benefits of source-to-sea management as a method to address local challenges.
The project delivered on a broader aim, to deepen our understanding of the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing source-to-sea management on a more general level. Application of this learning is used to strengthen the guidance provided to practitioners beyond the pilot sites, taking the forms of practical guidance, methods and tools that were developed.
The source-to-sea approach directly addresses the linkages along the source-to-sea continuum of land, water, delta, estuary, coast, nearshore and ocean ecosystems leading to holistic natural resources management and sustainable economic development.

The intended outcome of the source-to-sea approach is to identify appropriate courses of action to address alterations of key flows that connect the source-to-sea segments: water, biota, sediment, pollution, materials, and ecosystem services. Doing so results in economic, social, and environmental benefits.
The approach begins with understanding the pressures and drivers that have led to alterations in the key flows. In combination with selecting an appropriate scale of intervention, engagement of stakeholders (both upstream and downstream) and a thorough understanding of the governance context sets the basis for defining a theory of change to guide planning and implementation. Monitoring and adaptive management round out the process and can be used to refine the theory of change and ensure continuous improvement toward long-term outcomes.